Sony A7R II VS Sony A7 III (Which one to choose)

Let’s begin the battle between Sony A7R II VS Sony A7 III. Both cameras created Sony. These versions are contained in the Guru Mirrorless cameras. Sony A7 III premiered in 2018, and Sony A7R II in 2015. Alpha A7 III is newer, and this can be a plus. So after reading this post, You will know everything about the conflict of Sony A7R II VS Sony A7 III, and let’s see who wins.

However 3 decades, the distinction isn’t too bad. The gap of 18 MP is rather a lot. The more pictures the camera gets, the more clear and detailed the image will be. The number of megapixels may also alter the maximum dimensions of the photographs, which subsequently can be printed with no loss of quality.

The minimal ISO value for all these cameras is the same. A bigger maximum ISO lets you shoot excellent photos in the dark. The utmost ISO value for all these cameras is the same and is. Both cameras have 5-axis Sensor-shift image insertion.
Both cameras include a 3-inch leaning display. Both cameras have a digital viewfinder. Each of the viewfinders has a 2359k scatter resolution.
Burst mode, also known as continuous shooting mode, sports mode, or constant high-speed style, is a shooting style in still cameras. Sony Alpha A7 III has 5.0 fps continuous shooting.

You may like to read,

Our Choice

Sony A7 III

Sony A7 III

  • 42MP – Full-frame BSI-CMOS Sensor
  • Improved autofocus and 4k video
  • Better Imaging than Sony A7R III

Sony A7R II VS Sony A7 III: Key Specifications

Sony A7 III Key Specs

  • 24MP – Full-frame BSI-CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 100 – 51200 ( expands to 50-204800)
  • Sony E Mount
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3 Tilting Screen
  • 2360k dot Electronic viewfinder
  • 10.0 fps continuous shooting
  • 4K (UHD) – 3840 x 2160 video resolution
  • 120 fps High-Speed Video
  • Built-in Wireless
  • 650g. 127 x 96 x 74 mm
  • Weather-Sealed Body

Sony A7R II Key Specs

  • 42MP – Full-frame BSI-CMOS Sensor
  • No Anti-aliasing (AA) filter
  • ISO 100 – 25600 ( expands to 50-102400)
  • Sony E Mount
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3 Tilting Screen
  • 2359k dot Electronic viewfinder
  • 5.0 fps continuous shooting
  • 4K (UHD) – 3840 x 2160 video resolution
  • Built-in Wireless
  • 625g. 127 x 96 x 60 mm
  • Weather-Sealed Body

Size and Weight

Sony A7R II VS Sony A7 III: Key Specifications

The a7R II as well as also the a7 III are complete frame Sony bodies separated by many years of updates. However the form factor has not changed much; the two bodies are rather lightweight and compact, clocking in at 625 gram (for the Sony a7R II) and 650 gram (such as the Sony a7 III). Is this gap something you’ll see within the specialty? Probably not.

However, you may be certain that these two choices will supply you with a mild setup complete, ideal for backpacking, traveling photography, and much more.

You will observe that height and length will be the same, however, the a7III does package the larger front traction. This probably accounts for the excess weight, and in addition, it enhances the girth when shooting heavy lenses.

Related: 10 best Camera for beginner nature photography

Build and Handling

Though the a7R II as well as also the a7 III are almost identical in size and weight, there are a few subtle design differences you’ll want to look closely at.

Either the touch screen may be employed to select AF points, plus they are both much more suitable compared to a7R II wheel substitute.

In addition, you have a7 III’s improved front traction. It does not create a big gap when shooting, but in the event that you often use longer lenses, it will assist the a7 III installation to feel much more balanced.

In terms of construct, both cameras contain magnesium metal parts and adequate weather sealing.

Either body will be nice for experts who treat their gear nicely, but I would not suggest placing these cameras through severe evaluations (in other words, catch a waterproof rain cover, etc.).

A Difference between the a7R II along with also the a7 III, however, is your card slots: The a7R II only provides one SD slot, although the a7 III provides two slots — and also among those supports UHS-II cards.

For a few shooters, an excess card slot is merely an additional bonus, and when that is you, then the a7R II is going to work just fine.

Therefore, if you are one of these photographers, then go together with all the a7 III. Another little improvement worth noting: The two cameras incorporate in-body image insertion.

But you are likely to find a small increase using the a7 III, which provides five stops of IBIS when compared with 4.5 stops about the a7R II.

Related: 10 best kit lenses to buy

Hybrid autofocus system

The A7 III becomes the next camera following the A9 to comprise 693 stage detection points which cover 93 percent of the detector.

In addition, it has 425 comparison detection points, which makes it the version with the maximum variety of autofocus points of any mirrorless camera.

The A7r II has fewer things by contrast: 399 stage and 25 comparison detection point to be exact. Besides the additional points, the autofocus speed is quicker.

Stage detection autofocus may operate on each camera when an A-mount or DSLR lens is mounted through compatible adapters like the LA-EA3. Sony maintains that the operation was enhanced on the next-generation A7 cameras.

We discovered the A7III to do very well from the specialty. Its AF algorithm relies on the A9 and the functionality is near the flagship version.

The A7r II is great too but certainly struggles longer for genres between quite speedy actions.

Related: What Cameras Do YouTubers Use to Vlog? (10 Best Vlogging Camera)

Video specifications

Sony A7R II VS Sony A7 III

Both the A7 III and A7r II Could Capture in 4K Around 30fps and 100Mbps Using All the XAVC S codec.

You are able to opt between full-frame or Super35/APS-C style on each camera, however, the results are somewhat different as we will see below.

The A7 III overlooks the whole width of the detector and down-samples the data to generate sharp 4K footage with no moiré and aliasing.

But, it plays a small sensor harvest of 1.2x when shooting at 30fps, meaning it downsamples out of 5K instead of 6K of data. The A7r II gives you the very best results in Super35 style, in which it performs complete pixel readout to a smaller region (18MP).

The results are far better in terms of sharpness and low light performance compared to the complete frame mode, in which the camera must perform line bypassing as a result of the greater resolution.

Additional features you won’t find on the old version comprise XAVC-S Proxy and Slow & speedy motion.

Related: 10 best budget DSLR Camera for Beginners

Sensor Comparison

Sony A7 III includes a 24.0MP Total frame (35.8 x 23.8 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS detector and has a Bionz X chip. On the flip side, Sony A7R II includes a 42.0MP Total frame (35.9 x 24 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS detector and comprises a Bionz X chip.

Sony A7R II sensor supplies 18MP over Sony A7 III’s sensor, which provides a substantial advantage in actual life. It is possible to publish your images bigger or harvest more openly.

On the flip side, please bear in mind that Max detector resolution isn’t the only determinant of resolving power.
Factors like the optical components, low pass filter, pixel dimensions, and detector technology also impact the recorded picture’s final resolution.

Sony A7 III and Sony A7R II have the same sensor size, so no one has some substantial benefit over another in supplying control over field depth when combined with the same focal length and aperture.

Comparison for Available lenses

The amount of accessible lenses is a considerable decision variable while picking your lens camera. One other important element is the availability of image insertion.

The two Sony A7 III and Sony A7R II include Sensor established Picture stabilization, meaning that each of the lenses will likely be stabilized in those bodies.

Every one of these lenses ensures a Full frame detector. A7 III’s built-in Picture stabilization process can compensate vibration to 5.0-stops based on CIPA standards, whereas A7R II is system is ranked upto 4.5-stops.

The Winner?

The main difference between the A7 and A7r series has ever been the same, even though we return to the very first creation: the former provides a more well-balanced bundle at a lower cost whereas the latter is about the high heeled detector.

In our view, Sony played its cards exceptionally nicely with A7 III. Initially showcasing its most sufficient attributes on the A9 and A7r III, the newest was able to provoke debate and anticipation surrounding which technologies will make it on the A7 III. When the new version eventually did arrive, it ticked each box — by the advanced AF system according to that of the A9 into the upgraded body, 4K video capabilities, and new 24MP detector.

That is the reason why, for many photographers, the A7 III will probably be the thing to do. It is merely a well-rounded package. In their situation, the A7r II would be the better option.

Even the Sony a7R II and the Sony a7 III are equally impressive cameras and will supply the severe enthusiast or specialist a great deal of bang for their dollar.

However, they are different cameras which appeal to very different photographers.

On the one hand, you’ve got the a7R II: A high resolution, the compact body which packs adequate video and autofocus skills in a low cost, designed chiefly for landscape and business shooters.

Then you’ve got the a7 III. It costs a few hundred dollars extra, but you receive a leading 24 MP detector, blazing-fast autofocus, fantastic video capabilities, and much more.

So if you don’t need the higher resolution of this a7R II, I would suggest forking out the additional money and grabbing the a7 III.

Leave a Reply